Protocol / Criteria

Define What Success Means

A composition can express the right idea and still be unsuitable for the space. Evaluate creative fit, deployment fit and occupant response separately.

Write a brief that can be questioned

Start with the operating context established in the zone plan. Describe the atmosphere in ordinary language, identify the intended locations and list exclusions. A useful brief tells the fragrance studio what the experience should support without pretending that a preferred ingredient list is already the answer.

Words such as calm, clean and luxurious can mean different things to different reviewers. Ask each stakeholder to describe what they would notice if the intention were achieved. A quieter background presence, an absence of sweet associations or a clear distinction from cleaning products are reviewable observations. Claims about increasing sales, improving health or changing guest behaviour require evidence beyond a fragrance presentation.

Separate character from intensity

A reviewer may dislike how strongly a fragrance is presented rather than the composition itself. Capture those judgements in separate fields. Ask what the sample suggests, how noticeable it is and whether it feels appropriate to the particular zone. Include an option to say that the reviewer cannot distinguish a change.

Use clear sample identifiers and consistent presentation conditions. A blotter, a passive ceramic and a powered diffuser do not necessarily present the same composition in the same way. Early sampling can narrow creative direction, but the actual delivery method must be included before site approval.

Avoid evaluating many candidates in an uninterrupted session. Olfactory adaptation and fatigue can make later comparisons less dependable. Allow breaks, limit the session to a manageable set and record the order. Do not turn a small internal panel into a claim about universal guest preference.

Request documents for the actual use

Ask the supplier which documents apply to the proposed finished product, concentration, delivery method and market. An IFRA Certificate of Conformity, where applicable, is provided by the fragrance supplier for specified uses; it is not an IFRA approval of your building or a guarantee that no occupant will react.

Review safety data sheets where required, product labels, storage instructions and the supplier’s instructions for use. In the European Union, REACH and the CLP Regulation may be relevant to chemical supply and classification. The European Chemicals Agency provides regulatory information, but applying it to a product and deployment may require competent professional advice.

Keep a distinction between the fragrance concentrate, the finished refill and the device. Documents for one are not automatically sufficient for the others. Ask who controls formula changes and how an updated refill will be identified. Procurement should be able to link the approved sample to a supplied product and batch.

Include materials and operating constraints

Acceptance criteria should cover the surrounding environment, not just smell. Discuss potential contact with finishes, textiles and furnishings, and follow relevant product guidance on clearance and spill handling. Do not assume a composition suitable for one delivery system can be transferred into another.

Check refill availability, lead times, storage conditions and substitution rules. For a bespoke formula, clarify ownership, exclusivity, permitted applications and access if the studio stops supplying it. These are contract questions; “custom” alone does not establish that the client owns the formula or can reproduce it elsewhere.

Compare whole operating responsibilities as well as the initial commission. A lower development fee may sit alongside device commitments, consumable restrictions or service requirements. Request a written scope that distinguishes creative development, revisions, product supply, equipment and ongoing support without treating any quoted figure as a universal market benchmark.

Agree the decision method in advance

Name a review owner and a small cross-functional group. Define which questions require creative judgement, which require technical confirmation and which can block deployment. A concern about occupant response must not be averaged away because other reviewers like the smell.

Use a short evaluation sheet with room for observations, conditions and unresolved issues. If you use a rating scale, define its labels before collecting scores. Do not set arbitrary numerical thresholds that imply scientific validation. The goal is a transparent decision trail, not an impressive-looking chart.

End sample selection with a conditional decision: suitable for a controlled trial in named zones, subject to documented checks. This preserves the difference between liking a candidate and authorising installation. The next stage tests how that candidate behaves in the actual operating setting.